Skip to content

Conversation

@shreemaan-abhishek
Copy link
Contributor

@shreemaan-abhishek shreemaan-abhishek commented Jan 21, 2026

Description

#10550 implemented support for lua-resty-events, it's been long since; so we can remove the old events module lua-resty-worker-events.

Checklist

  • I have explained the need for this PR and the problem it solves
  • I have explained the changes or the new features added to this PR
  • I have added tests corresponding to this change
  • I have updated the documentation to reflect this change
  • I have verified that this change is backward compatible (If not, please discuss on the APISIX mailing list first)

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Choudhary <shreemaan.abhishek@gmail.com>
@dosubot dosubot bot added size:XL This PR changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. tech debt labels Jan 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Choudhary <shreemaan.abhishek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Choudhary <shreemaan.abhishek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Choudhary <shreemaan.abhishek@gmail.com>
"http_failures": 1
}
local core = require("apisix.core")
local route_config = {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had to convert json config to lua table to get rid of this error in CI:

Image

Comment on lines -18 to -22
BEGIN {
if ($ENV{TEST_EVENTS_MODULE} ne "lua-resty-worker-events") {
$SkipReason = "Only for lua-resty-worker-events events module";
}
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why can this test case only run using lua-resty-worker-events?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the deleted test cases have their counterparts that can run under lua-resty-events.

@AlinsRan AlinsRan requested a review from bzp2010 January 23, 2026 08:24
@Baoyuantop
Copy link
Contributor

Should we discuss this change on the mailing list? It appears to be a breaking change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:XL This PR changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. tech debt

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants