Attempt a monotonic revision based signals polyfill#145
Closed
sukima wants to merge 1 commit intolifeart:check-signalsfrom
Closed
Attempt a monotonic revision based signals polyfill#145sukima wants to merge 1 commit intolifeart:check-signalsfrom
sukima wants to merge 1 commit intolifeart:check-signalsfrom
Conversation
Prior to this change, we used the current signals polyfill which had some performance troubles. This change implements the signals API but uses Pzurek's monotonic revision to handle tracking and reactivity. This is an attempt to see if it shows performance improvements. Paired-with: NullVoxPopulli
Owner
|
@sukima thank you for contribution! I've invited you to repo, try to re-create PR from source (not from fork), likely it allow to run perf tests |
Owner
|
re-created with bench - #147 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prior to this change, we used the current signals polyfill which had some performance troubles.
This change implements the signals API but uses Pzurek's monotonic revision to handle tracking and reactivity.
This is an attempt to see if it shows performance improvements.
Paired-with: NullVoxPopulli